Input Buffer for Fuzz Face.

Started by Plexi, February 20, 2017, 06:50:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Plexi

Hi comunity!
Which is for you guys the best buffer to improve a Fuzz Face?

I'm thinking to try with this one:

I noticed that is almost the same (overal Classic 108, more or less) structure of the Oxblood distortion:


Or this one:



Suggestions?
Experiences?

Thanks!
To you, buffered bypass sucks tone.
To me, it sucks my balls.

blackieNYC

A fuzz face can be improved?  ;)
You might listen to one with and without a buffer. Most believe the FF works best when it's looking at the output of the pickup directly.
I would try a jfet buffer first.
  • SUPPORTER
http://29hourmusicpeople.bandcamp.com/
Tapflo filter, Gator, Magnus Modulus +,Meathead, 4049er,Great Destroyer,Scrambler+, para EQ, Azabache, two-loop mix/blend, Slow Gear, Phase Royal, Escobedo PWM, Uglyface, Jawari,Corruptor,Tri-Vibe,Battery Warmers

LiLFX

Isn't part of the magic of the fuzz face the loading effect it has on your pickups? Putting a buffer in front of a fuzz face and variants of it tend to make the effect fall apart.

antonis

As above well said..

A Fuzz Face with a buffer is no longer a Fuzz Face...!!
"I'm getting older while being taught all the time" Solon the Athenian..
"I don't mind  being taught all the time but I do mind a lot getting old" Antonis the Thessalonian..

Plexi

I know... I know...   :-[
I'm killing all the magic, that why I'll put the buffer with a dpdt switch.

My idea is to make it more friendly when I use with buffered pedals; like the Boss ones.
To you, buffered bypass sucks tone.
To me, it sucks my balls.

blackieNYC

Sometimes you just can't have everything at the front of the chain, can you? 
I did put a booster, then the AMZ pickup simulator circuit, in front of the octave-up Scrambler. It worked very well, but my purpose was to get more octave out of it while not having to roll back my guitar's tone control.
A boss pedal in bypass is a active buffer. I don't think other buffers will sound much different, but try a boost+pickup sim before you commit to anything. 
  • SUPPORTER
http://29hourmusicpeople.bandcamp.com/
Tapflo filter, Gator, Magnus Modulus +,Meathead, 4049er,Great Destroyer,Scrambler+, para EQ, Azabache, two-loop mix/blend, Slow Gear, Phase Royal, Escobedo PWM, Uglyface, Jawari,Corruptor,Tri-Vibe,Battery Warmers

Plexi

I know about Boss pedals, that's why I'm not trying to 'solve' anything out; just want to make an improvement, although it catches the nature of the beast.

It's a good one, actually, I'm using a LPB1 without boosting; and things works really good (as I commented in another thread about the 1k fuzz pot)
To you, buffered bypass sucks tone.
To me, it sucks my balls.

Ben N

I'm a couple of parts shy of finishing my Lunar Module clone, but the the basis of that rather well regarded fuzz and its lower gain stable mate the Screwdriver is putting another stage in front of a silicon fuzz face topology, in part in order to make it behave anywhere in the signal chain. It's more than a buffer, but buffering is surely part of the purpose. Check that out. BTW, if I recall correctly there was some work done over at the "other" forum on modernizing the classic fuzz with buffering.
  • SUPPORTER

amptramp

You could use a JFET buffer on a Fuzz Face if the gate resistor goes to ground.  Replace this gate resistor with a potentiometer that you could name the "SUCKAGE" control.  You could dial in the level of resistance you want to create the tone you want.  The other possibility would be a noiseless bias voltage divider with the pot between the gate / base and the bias source.  Either way, you get the advantages of adjustable tone sucking that gives you the ability to get the sound you want without changing pickups or matching tone between different guitars.

Plexi

Ben, great idea, I'll check about that.
BTW: I have there a board for the Lunar Module. I've read that is a FF with some kind of booster, to recreates Gilmour fuzz sounds on DSOTM.

amptrap, that's a lot of mods!
To you, buffered bypass sucks tone.
To me, it sucks my balls.

amptramp

Quote from: Plexi on February 21, 2017, 07:29:10 PM
amptrap, that's a lot of mods!

Not that much - in the schematic you posted of the Oxblood distortion, where you have R2 and R3, detach their junction from the rest of the circuitry and connect their junction to the base of Q1 through a 1 meg pot.  You may have to raise the value of R3 and reduce the value of R2 and add an electrolytic capacitor from the junction to ground.  In other words, add a pot and an electrolytic cap and change a couple of resistor values.  Not that big a mod.

If you had a preamp stage like a Tillman, just replace the gate resistor with a 1 megohm pot.  The advantage?  You get whatever tone sucking response you want, controllable by one pot.

Gus

Have you checked the "schematics" link on top of the page?
http://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/schematics.html
and http://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/rocket.JPG
Did you search for "fuzz face buffer" etc?

also look for the 3 transistor fuzz

A buffer before the fuzz with an added resistor in series between or other network does not sound the same as a FF direct to guitar

Plexi

Quote from: amptramp on February 21, 2017, 10:01:27 PM
Quote from: Plexi on February 21, 2017, 07:29:10 PM
amptrap, that's a lot of mods!

Not that much - in the schematic you posted of the Oxblood distortion, where you have R2 and R3, detach their junction from the rest of the circuitry and connect their junction to the base of Q1 through a 1 meg pot.  You may have to raise the value of R3 and reduce the value of R2 and add an electrolytic capacitor from the junction to ground.  In other words, add a pot and an electrolytic cap and change a couple of resistor values.  Not that big a mod.

If you had a preamp stage like a Tillman, just replace the gate resistor with a 1 megohm pot.  The advantage?  You get whatever tone sucking response you want, controllable by one pot.

Now I get it!
Yes..! I have the echoplex preamp, and I forgot to say that they works wornderfull. The cons: they add a lot of mids.
I'll try both; or try the tillman preamp instead my echoplex preamp.
Thanks!


Quote from: Gus on February 22, 2017, 05:22:36 AM
Have you checked the "schematics" link on top of the page?
http://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/schematics.html
and http://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/rocket.JPG
Did you search for "fuzz face buffer" etc?

also look for the 3 transistor fuzz

A buffer before the fuzz with an added resistor in series between or other network does not sound the same as a FF direct to guitar

Thanks!
I didn't know about that section of the forum, I'll check both.
Yes, I'm thinking in build another FF and leave the classic one alone  :D
To you, buffered bypass sucks tone.
To me, it sucks my balls.

duck_arse

to what amptramp says in reply #8



not exactly what you want, but the idea is there.
" I will say no more "

Mark Hammer

Apart from the tone-modifying options after the basic circuit, the Lovetone Big Cheese is essentially a Fuzz Face with a buffer up front.  The Geofex Great Cheddar  ( http://www.geofex.com/Article_Folders/grtchedrschm6.PDF ) is a clone of the Big Cheese.


diydave

Build a Big Cheese recently, without the tone-control stuff.
For the purists, the inputbuffer can be bypassed with the flip of a switch.
+1 for a fuzz face with buffer. It just makes the thing come alive.
Without it,... it sounds ok, nice, doable.

Plexi

Quote from: diydave on February 23, 2017, 03:01:34 AM
Build a Big Cheese recently, without the tone-control stuff.
For the purists, the inputbuffer can be bypassed with the flip of a switch.
+1 for a fuzz face with buffer. It just makes the thing come alive.
Without it,... it sounds ok, nice, doable.

heresy!!!!
:icon_mrgreen:
To you, buffered bypass sucks tone.
To me, it sucks my balls.

nocentelli

Biggest drawback of a buffer in front seems to be that it reduces the ability to clean up by turning down the guitar volume: Not really an issue if you only want to run it at maximum filth.
Quote from: kayceesqueeze on the back and never open it up again

Mark Hammer

Quote from: nocentelli on February 23, 2017, 12:33:05 PM
Biggest drawback of a buffer in front seems to be that it reduces the ability to clean up by turning down the guitar volume: Not really an issue if you only want to run it at maximum filth.
Isn't the series resistance feeding the base of Q1 supposed to do some of that, or does it just soften the clipping?

highwater

Quote from: Mark Hammer on February 23, 2017, 08:12:57 PM
Quote from: nocentelli on February 23, 2017, 12:33:05 PM
Biggest drawback of a buffer in front seems to be that it reduces the ability to clean up by turning down the guitar volume: Not really an issue if you only want to run it at maximum filth.
Isn't the series resistance feeding the base of Q1 supposed to do some of that, or does it just soften the clipping?

It does, but the series resistance doesn't go up anymore when you turn the guitar volume down. The magical cleanup with an unbuffered FF is as much (or more) from the added series resistance as it is from the lowered signal voltage.

--

The crummy thing about a buffered FF isn't so-much getting the sound right -- a pickup sim and a copy of the guitar's tone/volume controls will get you 95% there -- it's that you have to bend-down to adjust a knob on your pedal, whereas an unbuffered FF lets you do that right on the guitar.

If you always play fuzz parts with the volume and tone in one particular spot, it's just as good. If you fiddle with the guitar volume while you're playing, a better solution would be to have a separate buffer with a pickup sim, and put a volume pedal directly between the buffer and the FF. If you want to go all-out, you could make an expression-pedal version of a guitar tone knob too.
"I had an unfortunate combination of a very high-end medium-size system, with a "low price" phono preamp (external; this was the decade when phono was obsolete)."
- PRR