DIYstompboxes.com

DIY Stompboxes => Building your own stompbox => Topic started by: mac on December 08, 2006, 05:06:30 PM

Title: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: mac on December 08, 2006, 05:06:30 PM
Does anybody used  tantalum caps in a FF?
I'm not a fan of electrolytic caps and I always use poly caps, but they are big.
As far as I read tant caps do no suffer from aging, freq response is better than electolytics ones, but they are more expensive.

Pros and cons?

mac
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Gus on December 08, 2006, 05:17:35 PM
It is a taste issue.  Try it you might like the change be sure to intall them the right way.  Tants don't like reverse voltage and stink bad when they burn.

I often use a mix of cap types depending on the sound wanted.
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: zachomega on December 08, 2006, 05:35:45 PM
I can't recall where I read it, but I heard that tantalum caps are far worse than electrolytic caps for distortion. 

-Zach Omega
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Gus on December 08, 2006, 05:46:59 PM
A ff is distortion.
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Seljer on December 08, 2006, 05:57:52 PM
Quote from: Gus on December 08, 2006, 05:46:59 PM
A ff is distortion.

what if you're goal is a very transparent sounding fuzz face  :icon_razz:?
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: bluesdevil on December 08, 2006, 06:49:42 PM
I've used tantalum caps in place of the 2.2 uf and 22uf electros for a couple of recent Fuzz Face builds without problems. As far as tonal differences, I couldn't honestly say.
     
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: mac on December 08, 2006, 07:07:27 PM
Quote
I've used tantalum caps in place of the 2.2 uf and 22uf electros for a couple of recent Fuzz Face builds without problems. As far as tonal differences, I couldn't honestly say.

When I use polyester caps instead of electros the tonal change is big. Electros die on highs, a 0.1uf ceramic in parallel helps

Quote
I can't recall where I read it, but I heard that tantalum caps are far worse than electrolytic caps for distortion. 

I am not sure if I read about that tantalum caps are not a good choice between stages and bypass.
Replacing tantalum caps in the MXR+ and in the TS tone control is a common mod.

mac
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: markm on December 08, 2006, 07:36:43 PM
Quote from: zachomega on December 08, 2006, 05:35:45 PM
I can't recall where I read it, but I heard that tantalum caps are far worse than electrolytic caps for distortion. 

-Zach Omega

Mr. HUGE stuck a Tant cap in the Red Llama.
Not saying it's better or worse but, he didn't have to  :icon_smile:
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Dai H. on December 09, 2006, 12:16:54 AM
I tried a bigger value tantalum for the 22uF on the Fuzz pot once some time ago. Thought it was interesting. Tighter sounding IIRC (usually a FF is kind of round and mushy sounding).
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Ronsonic on December 09, 2006, 09:32:02 AM
I think of tants as another ingredient. They do feel a bit different in there. Anybody concerned about distortion from them is just being silly, there isn't a single stage we build in any pedal that doesn't distort more than these caps.

Rupert Neve seemed to think they didn't hurt the sound of his work, and we've got people warning against using them in a fuzz.  Uh yeah, right.

Ron
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: markm on December 09, 2006, 10:09:37 AM
Tants are in the original Orange Squeezer as well as most of the Dan Armstrong effects not to mention the Ross and Dynacomp circuits.
I read somewhere, probably here (!!) that during the development of the O/S, Dan tried other caps but insisted that the Tants were and important part of the sound and feel of the O/S.
This could be internet B/S also so, take it as it is but, just food for thought. :)
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: petemoore on December 09, 2006, 10:43:17 AM
  Oh yes,... and Why !/?
  Less common
  More expensive?
  Last longest IIRC
  Good enough for NASA, where Temperature performance standards are needed for other-worldly conditions.
  'reportedly May cause small traces of gritty distortion to form in 'unusual' places...
  50/50 chance of blowing up if you disregard polarity, films get a 100% chance of working when 'reversed.
  ...but in a FF?...J. Kiddin' of course...Why not?
  Mr. Huge decided to feed his Mammal one, and Dan decided his Electrodes could use 'em..lol !!!
  Does anybody used  tantalum caps in a FF?

Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: petemoore on December 09, 2006, 10:45:11 AM
Oh yes,... and Why !/?
  Less common
  More expensive?
  Last longest IIRC
  Good enough for NASA, where Temperature performance standards are needed for other-worldly conditions.
  'reportedly May cause small traces of gritty distortion to form in 'unusual' places...
  50/50 chance of blowing up if you disregard polarity, films get a 100% chance of working when 'reversed.
  ...but in a FF?...J. Kiddin' of course...Why not?
  Mr. Huge decided to feed his Mammal one, and Dan decided his Electrodes could use 'em..lol !!!
  Does anybody used  tantalum caps in a FF?
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: analogmike on December 09, 2006, 12:47:21 PM
Tantalum are the least reliable type in pedals IMHO. I have fixed several wayhuge pedals with dead tantalums (green rhinos), and several of our compressors with the same problem. A decent electrolytic will sound fabulous in almost any circuit.

have fun!
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Gus on December 09, 2006, 01:27:54 PM
This thread is fun to read.
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: markm on December 09, 2006, 01:50:50 PM
Quote from: Gus on December 09, 2006, 01:27:54 PM
This thread is fun to read.
Agreed.
One says "NASA" uses 'em because of reliability, another says basicly they're crap.
My Grandfather used to say "Opinions are like A**holes.....everybody's got one!"  :icon_lol:
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: Doug_H on December 09, 2006, 01:57:02 PM
I've used them and they sound fine and are reliable. Theoretically they should last much longer than electros. I noticed an improvement in smoothness in one circuit I did with a tant in place of an electro for a bypass cap. They are much less tolerant to reverse polarity than electros, so be careful. Otherwise they are fine, just another ingredient as Ron said.
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: johngreene on December 09, 2006, 02:35:04 PM
Quote from: markm on December 09, 2006, 01:50:50 PM
My Grandfather used to say "Opinions are like A**holes.....everybody's got one!"  :icon_lol:
And they all stink!

--john
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: mac on December 09, 2006, 07:01:45 PM
Quote
My Grandfather used to say "Opinions are like A**holes.....everybody's got one!" 

Quote
And they all stink!

I wash mine in the bidet with soap and it smell like flowers  :icon_mrgreen:
God how I miss my bidet when I travel to usa and eu...

mac
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: mac on December 09, 2006, 07:21:49 PM
It seems that tants reputations is good enough for NASA but when it comes to distortion we are looking for another things.

I wonder where a tant cap "distort" less, between stages or bypassing? I also wonder how a tant cap can distort a signal. I think that the previous transistor makes more distortion than any cap. Maybe what some call "tant cap distortion" is only a freq bandpass? Just guessing here.

Analogmike, thanks for the tip.

mac
Title: Re: Tantalum caps in a FF
Post by: johngreene on December 09, 2006, 07:30:14 PM
Quote from: mac on December 09, 2006, 07:21:49 PM
It seems that tants reputations is good enough for NASA but when it comes to distortion we are looking for another things.

I wonder where a tant cap "distort" less, between stages or bypassing? I also wonder how a tant cap can distort a signal. I think that the previous transistor makes more distortion than any cap. Maybe what some call "tant cap distortion" is only a freq bandpass? Just guessing here.

Analogmike, thanks for the tip.

mac
http://members.aol.com/sbench102/caps1.html (http://members.aol.com/sbench102/caps1.html)