How to Calculate Transistor Leakage?

Started by fuzzymuff, March 22, 2013, 09:52:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mac

Quote from: antonis on April 02, 2024, 04:02:43 PMSomebody MUST create a leakage current function of temperature and phase of the moon coordinates..

Ileakage(ic, T, a) = IRG(ic, T)*[R + r*cos(a/2)]

where
ic is the collector current
T the temparature
IRG is the RG leakage current
R is the average Sun to Earth distance
r is how much the Earth drifts from the average distance as it circles around the Sun
a is the angle of the orbit in radians

This Eq should be corrected to include moon phase and Mojo.

mac
mac@mac-pc:~$ sudo apt install ECC83 EL84
no such packages, but you can install "Quad Cortex", "Helix" or "Kemper" instead.

mac

Quote from: Ginsly on April 02, 2024, 04:07:07 PMwould I still use the standard (V-Vc*)/2472 to calculate leakage or would I also altar that slightly because of the 9.4 volts being fed into the tester?

Just measure the voltage drop across the 2472 and divide the result by 2472.

mac
mac@mac-pc:~$ sudo apt install ECC83 EL84
no such packages, but you can install "Quad Cortex", "Helix" or "Kemper" instead.

duck_arse

mac, don't forget the minus sign - that lot are in the northern hemisphere.
are you feeling queezy yet? it's a good time to sell!

zbt

@GibsonGM, OK  :icon_mrgreen:

Due to different VBE even my lovely OC44 has 0.25V, also Si and Darlington,
this draft come to mind!



combine with Ian Fritz method for match vbe, maybe we can also match hfe,
using current constant source.

GibsonGM

Thanks, I just 'approximated' the R.G. method, and managed to turn up 2 BJTs out of a bunch I have that seem like they'll work in a FF!   8)  I need good germanium transistors approximately once every 20 years, ha ha   :icon_mrgreen:
  • SUPPORTER
MXR Dist +, TS9/808, Easyvibe, Big Muff Pi, Blues Breaker, Guv'nor.  MOSFace, MOS Boost,  BJT boosts - LPB-2, buffers, Phuncgnosis, FF, Orange Sunshine & others, Bazz Fuss, Tonemender, Little Gem, Orange Squeezer, Ruby Tuby, filters, octaves, trems...

zbt

Yup for germanium, just measure real value of resistor, and voltage, a little counting is enough for precision.

I need a versatile one, also for superfuzz match.

Phend

#86
Just bb the keen tester using a series of resistors to get 2.2m and 2.472k, of course the dmm has an inaccuracy, but good enough. I'm gonna think like a dog, "my ears" will be the ultimate judge, I won't "chase my tail" with irrelevant minute differences, else I will never get a "muff fuzz".
But I hope to sort the good, bad and ugly.

From Freestompboxes, a table:
2.472v = 1mA
1.236v = 500 uA
0.989v = 400 uA
0.741v = 300 uA
0.494v = 200 uA
0.247v = 100 uA
0.124v = 50uA
    ^ Voltage across 2.472K resistor with 2.2M lifted.

And RG says:
"How much leakage is too much? 100uA is common, 200 happens pretty often. More than 300uA means the device is suspicious, and more than 500uA I would say is bad."
  • SUPPORTER+
Do you know what you're doing?

Phend

Interesting thread,
How many decimal places should I calculate the leakage to ?
(At my age leakage is observed in drops per hour)
  • SUPPORTER+
Do you know what you're doing?

mac

QuoteHow many decimal places should I calculate the leakage to ?

If you want that Hendrix tone as many as Pi!  :icon_lol:

mac
mac@mac-pc:~$ sudo apt install ECC83 EL84
no such packages, but you can install "Quad Cortex", "Helix" or "Kemper" instead.

PRR

  • SUPPORTER

Phend

#90
Humm..
I am finding that my Elcheapo Tester and Cheapo DMM and the my state of the art Keen BB differ.

Case 1 1T308V
Tester 72
DMM  75
Keen   42

Case 2 2N518A
Tester 153
Keen   154


Case 3 (unknown)
Tester 102
DMM  166
Keen   89

I will use RG's test , since he has shown the math's and explanations. 
The Chinese units I have are good for sorting resistors.
Those don't account for than darn leakage.
Apparently to make the holy grail FF these things need to be known.

  • SUPPORTER+
Do you know what you're doing?

Rob Strand

#91
Quote from: Phend on June 07, 2024, 04:26:55 PM"How much leakage is too much? 100uA is common, 200 happens pretty often. More than 300uA means the device is suspicious, and more than 500uA I would say is bad."

If you are vetting devices then it depends on what you expect.    You might not be overly concerned with an AC128 at 300uA but you would certainly be thinking something is wrong if it was an OC44.   Most devices are around the values RG quotes.

As for using the correct leakage for a given circuit, that's a different story.   Maybe some AC128 work and some AC128's don't because the leakage is too high.
Send:     . .- .-. - .... / - --- / --. --- .-. -
According to the water analogy of electricity, transistor leakage is caused by holes.

Mcentee2

#92
Apologies for raising this again!!

Given it all aligns to ohm's law, does it really matter about strictly 9v supply, 2.2m and a 2.472K resistors ?

Can I just use whatever voltage my battery puts out and whatever resistors I have to hand, say a 1M and 2k or something, measure voltages and plug them into a spreadsheet ?

Is there anything special about the RG ones apart from the ease by which you can visually convert the voltage readings to leakage current ?

Edit: ok, I might have found answers myself which is always a good sign! I can see that the choice of 2M2 makes the q1 base current similar to that in a fuzz face at operating conditions, 4uA. The choice of 9v and 2K472 them makes the calculations easier, but can be anything reasonable.


mac

QuoteCan I just use whatever voltage my battery puts out and whatever resistors I have to hand, say a 1M and 2k or something, measure voltages and plug them into a spreadsheet ?

Rewind some pages, I posted the maths for any [Vcc, Rc, Rb] set.

mac
mac@mac-pc:~$ sudo apt install ECC83 EL84
no such packages, but you can install "Quad Cortex", "Helix" or "Kemper" instead.

zbt


R.G.

I'm always surprised and amused at myself when this comes back up again. The leakage tester was made at a time when test-everything boxes were not available. I actually thought that by specifying a weird resistor value to indicate the leakage currents by just moving a decimal point was going to be useful, kind of a pre-computer/analog-computer way to get the numbers.

In retrospect, I maybe should have just stuck in a standard value and told everyone to get out their calculators.  :icon_lol:   It wasn't supposed to be confusing or complicated, honest.
R.G.

In response to the questions in the forum - PCB Layout for Musical Effects is available from The Book Patch. Search "PCB Layout" and it ought to appear.

zbt

I think John Why used a pencil  ;D

Nice to meet you, Sir.

The VU just for the fun.

PRR

#97
get out their calculators

-

  • SUPPORTER

Mcentee2

Quote from: R.G. on January 10, 2025, 10:47:38 AMI'm always surprised and amused at myself when this comes back up again. The leakage tester was made at a time when test-everything boxes were not available. I actually thought that by specifying a weird resistor value to indicate the leakage currents by just moving a decimal point was going to be useful, kind of a pre-computer/analog-computer way to get the numbers.

In retrospect, I maybe should have just stuck in a standard value and told everyone to get out their calculators.  :icon_lol:   It wasn't supposed to be confusing or complicated, honest.

That's good to hear :) thanks!

R.G.

Quote from: PRR on January 11, 2025, 01:23:11 AMget out their calculators
-
There is still a Log-Log Duplex in my center desk drawer in its leather case. It's a veteran of my first three undergrad years. As a senior, I saved up enough to get a four-function electronic.  :icon_biggrin:
R.G.

In response to the questions in the forum - PCB Layout for Musical Effects is available from The Book Patch. Search "PCB Layout" and it ought to appear.