NP cap to polarized

Started by AMK, March 17, 2025, 04:34:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

AMK



Between pin 8 and 9 of the Lm324 there's weird symbol- a 15uf NP cap, since we believe in SMD Versions I'm thinking of using just a polarized one(unless someone gonna prove me other).
Where should the positive placed?
Early versions were using two caps like this:



The newer XO seems to ditch it:




ElectricDruid

Pin 9 of the LM324 is basically a virtual ground*, and the output will switch from close to one rail to close to the other.

So that's why they used a non-polarised cap (or the equivalent arrangement of a pair of polarised caps) - because either orientation of a polarised cap is going to be wrong half the time!

HTH

* It's not exactly at the midpoint voltage since 2.4K+820R is not 3.9K, but that doesn't matter here.

GGBB

  • SUPPORTER

Rob Strand

#3
When you see caps marked NP it generally means non-polar electrolytic capacitor.   They have no polarity marking.  These are different to the more common polarized electrolytic capacitors, which have a polarity marking.

Unless you know better you shouldn't replace an NP cap on a circuit with common electrolytic, or visa-versa for that matter.

Using two back-to-back connected polarized electrolytic caps in place of an NP cap is a valid change - as is done on the two examples.

What's on the PCB's is a different matter but the idea still applies.    Check the polarity markings and the value.
Send:     . .- .-. - .... / - --- / --. --- .-. -
According to the water analogy of electricity, transistor leakage is caused by holes.

Phend

#4
Used NP in the AE Tremolo. 1uF, 3 places, probably matched them. They didn't replace polarized electrolics.


  • SUPPORTER+
Do you know what you're doing?

ElectricDruid

Quote from: GGBB on March 17, 2025, 05:02:57 PMAre you sure?



Good spot, Gord! That does look a lot like it!

AMK

Quote from: ElectricDruid on March 17, 2025, 04:57:47 PMPin 9 of the LM324 is basically a virtual ground*, and the output will switch from close to one rail to close to the other.

So that's why they used a non-polarised cap (or the equivalent arrangement of a pair of polarised caps) - because either orientation of a polarised cap is going to be wrong half the time!

HTH

* It's not exactly at the midpoint voltage since 2.4K+820R is not 3.9K, but that doesn't matter here.

Ohhh I see
 

Quote from: GGBB on March 17, 2025, 05:02:57 PM
Quote from: AMK on March 17, 2025, 04:34:43 PMThe newer XO seems to ditch it:



Are you sure?




Nice catch! pin 8 and 9 seems like they're connected together, that got me confused...

antonis

Quote from: AMK on March 18, 2025, 08:50:49 AMpin 8 and 9 seems like they're connected together,

Good for a buffer (voltage follower), like IC4d..
"I'm getting older while being taught all the time" Solon the Athenian..
"I don't mind  being taught all the time but I do mind a lot getting old" Antonis the Thessalonian..

AMK

which method is more recommended- two polarized 33uf back-to-back or 15uf np?

duck_arse

do you have any 15uF non-polarised on hand? can you source them [do you want to have to?] easy and cheap?
do you have 33uF [or 22uF or 47uF] polarised on hand? space to fit them?

same either way electrically, so comes down to what you've got/can get/will fit.
Hey, Scoop - how's your security clearance?

Check your Signal level there, Scoop - I thought you said witchhunt.

ElectricDruid

Quote from: AMK on March 18, 2025, 09:28:17 AMwhich method is more recommended- two polarized 33uf back-to-back or 15uf np?

+1 what Duck said. Same difference. Whichever is easiest, cheapest, fits best.