Inside the new Little Big Muff;

Started by Bernardduur, March 28, 2006, 10:58:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

hairyandy

Quote from: A.S.P. on March 29, 2006, 12:49:19 AM
maybe I`ve just misinterpreted these recent lines by a current moderator of this forum:

Quote"...The same is true of ZVex, Teese, new ElectroHarmonix, and multiple others. Any circuit that claims to be one of these, or uses the trade name of one of these product links will be removed...."
(reply#1)

:icon_question:

I think that you can pretty safely assume that this doesn't apply to the Big Muff or any derivatives.  The BMP schematic has been floating around for ever and you can find it on the web with very little effort...

Andy Harrison
It's all about signal flow...
Hairyandy's Layout Gallery

petemoore

 (Now why did I build a separate Jumbo Tone Bender)??
  I suggest it's because you like them or...
  Subconciously predicted it'd be good to have a spare.
  You somehow knew you might want to have two, to compare.
  Two are always better than one.
  Is not the Double Muff a couple Seriesed Big Muff Circuits?
Convention creates following, following creates convention.

nelson

Quote from: Bernardduur on March 29, 2006, 10:01:23 AM
Tone stack is the same as the NYC reissue BMP; pics are already posted in the Lounge forum


The tonestack is the same as the Russian Green muff. Different from current reissue.

Atleast going by the Tonepad schems.
My project site
Winner of Mar 2009 FX-X

WGTP

I looked at this tone stack using Duncan and it has less of a notch and is about a 1/2 octive higher in frequency.   It seems to be a compromise between the original tone stack and a Treble control.  :icon_cool:
Stomping Out Sparks & Flames

A.S.P.

Analogue Signal Processing

nelson

My project site
Winner of Mar 2009 FX-X