wah fed into another wah SRV syle

[formerMember1]

gotch ya 

it was only ground down enough to mount the dual gang pot, not too much that it changed the strength,.. it is completely solid,

*edit* i wouldn't ever trade/sell something that wasn't strong or reliable 

[Paul Perry (Frostwave)]

Surely the two wahs should be in PARALLEL not series??

[Paul Marossy]

OK, here is how I feel is the right way to modify a wah shell for a dual ganged pot:



The area at the back of the pots is where the material was removed.


Here you can see that about 3/32" of material was removed to allow the pot to fit without grinding down the bracket that holds the pot.


FWIW. 

[numpty]

Back to the SRV question - maybe the input was split and each wah was feed into a different amplifier.

[alderbody]

I made a pedal once, which is actually a "parked wah".

When i combine it with my normal wah i get interesting sounds.

Of course only one of them does the frequency sweep, but the tone is somehow richer.

Good, but not for "all the time"...

[Mark Hammer]

Anderton had the Dual Filter pedal in EPFM I.  This was a board that used the same type of bandpass filter seen in the Bi-Filter Follower, except two of them, using a dual op-amp (4739, of course  ).  If memory serves, it assumed a dual-ganged pot but stereo inputs/outputs.  I'll have to dig out the binder and read it over again, but I suspect this was intended for those circumstances where a guitar might use separate outputs for the two pickups.  Naturally, this means the two wah filters operated in parallel.

[stumper1]

Could one of the wah pots been wired backwards so that as one swept up the other swept down ala Anderton's Wah/Anti-wah?