Effect loop pedal impedance

Started by Buffalo Tom, November 25, 2020, 03:42:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Buffalo Tom

Hello. I need an effect loop pedal for inserting various guitar effects and control both send and return levels. It should be optimized for both guitar and keyboard/synth. So is the impedance switch a good idea? Or should I just keep it 1M for keyboards too. Is there any disadvantages with the high Z? I want the pedal to have as low noise as possible. And whats a suitable return impendance? Low or High...

Thanks for your time


PRR

Keep it 1Meg for anything. (That's actually a broadcast line proposed spec but rarely followed.)

The 1Meg may raise hiss when left OPEN but why would you do that?? When plugged to keyboard it "sees" the 470r-2k or so of the electronics, in parallel with the 1Meg, for a satisfactorily low impedance.

5532 is a great lo-hiss device for <6k sources, but isn't TL07 a hair better for >50k guitar? (Either ought to be fine for synths/epiano/organ)

If you DID need two input loadings, it would be sweeter to leave the 1Meg on permanently and use a SPST to tack on 47k (or 49.318k) as needed. So the input is never left unchained.
  • SUPPORTER

Buffalo Tom

Quote from: PRR on November 25, 2020, 03:56:19 PM
Keep it 1Meg for anything. (That's actually a broadcast line proposed spec but rarely followed.)

The 1Meg may raise hiss when left OPEN but why would you do that?? When plugged to keyboard it "sees" the 470r-2k or so of the electronics, in parallel with the 1Meg, for a satisfactorily low impedance.

5532 is a great lo-hiss device for <6k sources, but isn't TL07 a hair better for >50k guitar? (Either ought to be fine for synths/epiano/organ)

If you DID need two input loadings, it would be sweeter to leave the 1Meg on permanently and use a SPST to tack on 47k (or 49.318k) as needed. So the input is never left unchained.

Thanks Paul. I will remove the switch and go with 1M. And I figure thats a good value for the return impedance resistor (R9) too.

antonis

Just for 1M impedance, wisely proposed by Paul..

NE5532 doesn't like bias resistors of values greater than 100k or so..
Of course, for a +/- 15V buffer it shouldn't be an issue - unless AUDIO input signal amplitude is marginally close to Vee minus Vbias offset..

If case of the above probability, split R2 into 2 X 47k and bootstrap their junction via a cap from opamp out/inverting input..
"I'm getting older while being taught all the time" Solon the Athenian..
"I don't mind  being taught all the time but I do mind a lot getting old" Antonis the Thessalonian..

Buffalo Tom

#4
Quote from: antonis on November 25, 2020, 04:20:46 PM
Just for 1M impedance, wisely proposed by Paul..

NE5532 doesn't like bias resistors of values greater than 100k or so..
Of course, for a +/- 15V buffer it shouldn't be an issue - unless AUDIO input signal amplitude is marginally close to Vee minus Vbias offset..

If case of the above probability, split R2 into 2 X 47k and bootstrap their junction via a cap from opamp out/inverting input..

The NE5532 with +/-15V and 1M bias resistor was something I borrowed from this schematic
http://guitar-fx-layouts.42897.x6.nabble.com/file/n32135/Suhr_Minimix_II.jpg

antonis

#5
It's up to you... :icon_wink:
(but also borrow C5 decoupling cap - it's there NOT only for R10/C5 LPF)

P.S.
What I said above concerns the probability of 800mV (800nA max X 1M) misbias might be an issue..
"I'm getting older while being taught all the time" Solon the Athenian..
"I don't mind  being taught all the time but I do mind a lot getting old" Antonis the Thessalonian..

PRR

> probability of 800mV (800nA max X 1M) misbias

800mV is not too probable; if +/-15V supply as noted even 800mV is no real problem; 800mV won't even blow-up his electrolytic caps (and he could check the DC and turn-around if that feels better).
  • SUPPORTER