Interesting video on fake chips

Started by Onion Ring Modulator, March 12, 2023, 10:02:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

CheapPedalCollector


Paul Marossy

Quote from: CheapPedalCollector on March 17, 2023, 03:09:22 AM
Quote from: Kevin Mitchell on March 16, 2023, 01:28:28 PM
What was the sign? Slow slew rate?

Very noisy and had distortion.

Was this a single case, or consistent with several? Could be that the chip got damaged by an electrostatic discharge or something like that.

My only experience with a TL074 was with a squealing Classic EQ preamp module for my Seymour Duncan Convertible amp. When I replaced the TL074 the squealing stopped. From that experience I've always felt that the TL074 was kinda dodgy but I suppose my one negative experience doesn't mean they are bad IC chips. Could have been any number of reasons why that went bad inside a hot tube amp chassis.

Kevin Mitchell

#22
Yeah I wouldn't say "they sold me a fake chip", but rather "the chip I got was defective", but I know that doesn't sound much better  :icon_lol:. Or does it?
But I'm a biased fanboy. What can I say.

I've seen reports of fake TL071 chips around the web in recent years. Looked ok phyiscally but when it was put to task as a non-inverting amp for a multiplexed signal (don't know exactly what speed, likely 20kHz or so - wasn't clocked too fast) the output would just look like a swiggled line on the scope and would not stabilize fast enough to represent the multiplexed channels. Such poor quality chip would make a pulse look like an ugly sine. That's prof of a poor slew rate.
  • SUPPORTER

CheapPedalCollector

I bought 10, they came in a chip tube so likelyhood they all got static damage is low. They all were like this, I bought some from Mouser and they work fine. Comparing the chips, both Ti, the ones I bought from SB are not the same and look suspect, I can take pics if you want.

I just figure they got a bad batch from whoever the supplier was. This was before they changed hands btw.

I've had a couple of order goof ups since then, but they were quickly resolved which I attributed to growing pains.

Paul Marossy

#24
Quote from: CheapPedalCollector on March 17, 2023, 03:41:56 PM
I bought 10, they came in a chip tube so likelyhood they all got static damage is low. They all were like this, I bought some from Mouser and they work fine. Comparing the chips, both Ti, the ones I bought from SB are not the same and look suspect, I can take pics if you want.

I just figure they got a bad batch from whoever the supplier was. This was before they changed hands btw.

I've had a couple of order goof ups since then, but they were quickly resolved which I attributed to growing pains.

Around 15 years ago I built guitar effects for a certain well known "boutique" manufacturer. At the time they offered a buffer circuit, and sometimes they would have weird problems and sometimes not. As I recall they used a TL072 (maybe it was a TL071?), and one of the sections remained unused. They followed the normal conventions with respect to how to treat an unused opamp section. In spite of all that end results were somewhat unpredictable. So much so that I heard they eventually stopped making that pedal (sometime after I had went back into consulting engineering following 16 months of unemployment 2009-2010). I have also tried using them in unity gain circuits and they just don't seem to like that environment. They sound good/work OK most of the time but those TL072s seem to be very quirky in some situations, in my experience.

Maneco

Wow, that video about fake chips is quite an eye-opener! It really highlights how cautious we need to be about the components we use, especially in tech projects.

Mark Hammer

#26
I've told and retold this story elsewhere here, but it bears repeating.
Shortly before pandemic times, a local buddy brought me his two Diamond Memory Lane pedals.  One worked flawlessly, and the other had an annoyingly audible whine.  The "good" one was for comparison.  At first I thought it was the classic trimpot-set-wrong issue, and corresponded with the tech at Diamond to identify what trimmers were for what purpose.  A few e-mails back and forth and I eventually mentioned that the whining wouldn't start until the unit was powered up for about 5-10 minutes.  This rang the required bell for the tech and he told me that they had unintentionally installed some bad regulators in one run of the pedals.  He told me what to look for and sure enough the heat fin on one of the three voltage regulators was about a third the thickness of the other two.  As a closed box there was nowhere for the heat to go, so after a few minutes the heat would build up and the regulator would drift off-spec, resulting in the whine.  Bear in mind this is a reputable pedal manufacturer, that purchased components from a reputable distributor, made by a reputable manufacturer.  The part in question had clearly not been picked up by QC.

I mention this because the major semiconductor makers will all have QC in place but sometimes stuff skips through during production.  I imagine some of that gets sold to jobbers as "functional, but...".  So, in addition to outright fakes, like 16-pin "versions" of 14-pin chips, there can also be components that really ARE what they purport to be, but simply aren't up to the specs of whatever normally meets QC.

Maneco

For anyone interested in documenting or sharing similar investigative content, it might be worth looking into a tool like https://www.movavi.com/screen-recorder/. It's great for capturing video straight from your screen while also recording commentary, making it easier to explain complex subjects clearly and engagingly.