Dynacomp /Ross attack and separate Release pontesiometers

[Motifnick]

Hi! It is a topic that has been discussed a lot. BUT yesterday evening there was a discussion with gptchat and he suggested that I not change the well-known R18 150k resistor that affects both. But for the release potentiometer in R20 and for the attack potentiometer before C13 in series. I have not seen anything like this anywhere. He analyzed it in depth and justified what he mentioned to me. My schematic

is from a kit and I am attaching it. What opinions are there about this?

[duck_arse]

What opinions are there about this?

don't talk to ai - stick with us real people.

from your circuit diagram, R20 is in series w/ the out level pot, and therefore has no correlation to either attack or release. surprisingly, C13 is also in that series string, and also has nothing to do with attacking or releasing.

so you can tell old mate chat to stop talking bollocks.

[Motifnick]

What opinions are there about this?

don't talk to ai - stick with us real people.

from your circuit diagram, R20 is in series w/ the out level pot, and therefore has no correlation to either attack or release. surprisingly, C13 is also in that series string, and also has nothing to do with attacking or releasing.

so you can tell old mate chat to stop talking bollocks.

you are right... about attack i notice that the attack is being carried away by the R13 before the T2..about the release the R20 control the C10 before T3..maybe make sense to try pontesiometer there? forget the C13 spot this is the output cap...but the C10 make me wonder....for release time. is possible to control separate attack...and release with two pot's? 😥