Tube Mini-Booster ?

Started by petemoore, January 31, 2008, 12:05:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

petemoore

  Of course, but does it behave anything or a lot like the Jfet version ?
  Gave up on the Hybrid Reverb idea [actually the wires on the tranny I had were so short one pulled out when I tried to strip it .akm. so that ideas shorted].
  I almost have a tube minibooster..9 pin socket with power supplies close by and an amp right there too !
  Here's what I'm thinking...valve Jr. with 2 input tubes.
  12ax7 [a] being gain stage, full 12au7 being for the Mu amp, 12ax7 being a cathode follower driving tone control or tonestack.
Convention creates following, following creates convention.

snoof

I'd love to see the MB adapted for tube use, sounds interesting.

Krinor

Very interesting.
Let's see what you're working on.  :icon_cool:

Dragonfly

Quote from: snoof on January 31, 2008, 12:37:31 PM
I'd love to see the MB adapted for tube use, sounds interesting.

Actually, the MB was adapted FROM tube use !  ;)

DougH

Yeah, just look up "cascode" or "SRPP".
"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you."

petemoore

Actually, the MB was adapted FROM tube use !
 Yupp..Jfet's are cool like that.
 I'm thinking of putting what could be sort of like the 2nd 1/2 of the BSIAB on the front end of a Valve Jr. headclone.
 Sacrificing 1/2 of the input gain stages for a buffer to drive the tonestack, having the Mu section bypassable...but I'm none too sure about bypassing tube gain stages at the associated HV's.
 ^That'd be a gain stage >/mu amp>/ buffer-tonestack, amp.
 The next block diagram would be ordered such as:
 Mu amp [with grounded input bypass arrangement] > gain stage, buffer-tonestack, amp.
 or
 12au7=Mu amp [w/grounded input BP] >12ax7=Buffer tonestack, gainstage, then amp.
 The latter seems pretty good.
Convention creates following, following creates convention.

petemoore

#6
  I guess I'm wondering about the theory or if anyone's had experience with the sound of a tube mu amp driving an output which distorts well otherwise.
  Channel mixer was an idea, however the existing preamp is non-inverting, mu amp inverts..so it'd be one or the other or both.
   Liking the sound of the amp as is, ..lots of options..
  So I'm a little vague on how exactly to wire it.
 
Convention creates following, following creates convention.

amz-fx

For anyone who has the Analog Music Projects Newsletter on my web site, there is a schematic of a tube mini-booster in it.

The patent that is referenced on my mini-booster page is more of a SRPP circuit and not exactly a mu-follower type of circuit. There is a copy there for downloading  :icon_biggrin:

After messing around with the tube MB, I decided that mostly it was a waste of a triode section to use that circuit instead of the standard common cathode amplifier  :icon_cry:  There's not much to be gained with the more complicated two-tube circuit.

regards, Jack



petemoore

Convention creates following, following creates convention.