This switching will pop, right?

Started by strungout, June 29, 2019, 06:56:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

strungout

Hey.

Is there a better way to do it with a 4PDT? I want to switch in 4 caps in parallel with four others in my Magnavibe build, to get slower or stock  speed options.

I'm not opposed to using 2 switches...

Hope you guys can make it out through that photobucket INKmark...


"Displaying my ignorance for the whole world to teach".

"Taste can be acquired, like knowledge. What you find bitter, or can't understand, now, you might appreciate later. If you keep trying".

duck_arse

can we see the circuit diagram? switchings in the oscillator should not cause any pops.
" I will say no more "

strungout

#2
Quote from: duck_arse on June 29, 2019, 10:46:51 AM
can we see the circuit diagram? switchings in the oscillator should not cause any pops.


Hmm, thanks, didn't think about that. Usually when we talk about popping, it's always a cap in the audio path. So I guess it will discharge once the cap is connected but it won't make it into the audio signal cause they're not connected...

Here's the schem:

I added another pole to the pso just because I wanted to see what I'd get and it seemed to have smoothed out the transistion between high and low.
"Displaying my ignorance for the whole world to teach".

"Taste can be acquired, like knowledge. What you find bitter, or can't understand, now, you might appreciate later. If you keep trying".

PRR

As said, switching the LFO won't "POP" in the audio. However it may burp the LFO bias so the LFO cuts-out for some period of time (~~part-second).

In this plan, only the end caps really see DC, the two in the middle should be fine without anti-pop.




> I added another pole to the pso

That reduces the range that you can get. With this pot range, a 3-stage allows 1.9:1 range; a 4-stage allows 1.6:1 range.
  • SUPPORTER

strungout

Quote from: PRR on June 29, 2019, 09:07:30 PM
As said, switching the LFO won't "POP" in the audio. However it may burp the LFO bias so the LFO cuts-out for some period of time (~~part-second).

In this plan, only the end caps really see DC, the two in the middle should be fine without anti-pop.




> I added another pole to the pso

That reduces the range that you can get. With this pot range, a 3-stage allows 1.9:1 range; a 4-stage allows 1.6:1 range.

Paul: Thanks for the diagram! I will do that.

So, the 1uF cap + 1M5, across base and collector, is the third pole then? Means I misread the schem. I read that two poles is technically enough, but it won't reach a full 90 degrees per stage to get 180 total. But 3 stages of 60 will get you there. Thought there was only two poles. Ha.

Think I'll rebuild it with stock values on my BB and re-do my mods one by one to see which/if they really did make a difference or not. The phrase "you hear what you want to hear" is running around my head a lot lately ;D
"Displaying my ignorance for the whole world to teach".

"Taste can be acquired, like knowledge. What you find bitter, or can't understand, now, you might appreciate later. If you keep trying".

PRR

> the 1uF cap + 1M5, across base and collector, is the third pole then? Means I misread the schem. I read that two poles is technically enough

The 1.5Meg is Miller-Effected by transistor gain to something near 10k like the other poles.

2 stages could only work with infinite gain. 3 stages can work with gain like 28. 4 stages can work with some lower gain.

A several-stage R-C network with only one variable part will not make a lot of range. Making that part more-variable requires more gain and drive. If you had a 3 or 4-gang pot you could vary frequency linear with pot resistance. But the range needed for trem is usually small, and 1-gang pots are SO much cheaper...

You could consider a 2-gang pot; it might eliminate the need for a caps-switch.
  • SUPPORTER

strungout

Paul: Good idea. So, I would just turn that other 10k into a 2k2 leading into the 2nd part of the dual-gang pot, then? Having just a knob to turn will eliminate the need for a switch. That's good. Less clutter.
"Displaying my ignorance for the whole world to teach".

"Taste can be acquired, like knowledge. What you find bitter, or can't understand, now, you might appreciate later. If you keep trying".

strungout

Well, I tried a dual-gang pot and it works really well! Gained a bit more fast and a bit more slow. More gangs would be even better. I found a 3-gang , at mouser, I think, but not in 25k version. I could just put 120k resistors across each set of outer lugs... It'll have to wait til I have some more stuff to order XD In the meantime, I can use a switch along with the pot Stephen (duck) showed me some stuff for switching options/ideas. Together, they will give me a wide range of speed. At least compared to the original.

Right now, I'm also trying to do some nice graphics for the box. Tried t-shirt transfer but it wouldn't sfully stick. Bought some clear sticker paper. Should be simpler, ha. Anyway, I'll post pics when I'm done.

Thanks again for the help, guys!
"Displaying my ignorance for the whole world to teach".

"Taste can be acquired, like knowledge. What you find bitter, or can't understand, now, you might appreciate later. If you keep trying".