VREF is way too high

Started by mark2, May 11, 2021, 11:11:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mark2

I have a voltage divider (between 8.9V and GND) and expect the VREF to be ~4.5V, but it's reading 8.3V.

I'm wondering if anyone can give this a second set of eyes and tell me if you see anything boneheaded I did that would pull it up that high.

Edit: 1. Ignore the clip/RIN mixup, that's not on the real board.  2. And I've done a variation of this circuit quite a few times without problems, so it's possibly an assembly problem but boy I'm pulling my hair out on this one.


antonis

R9 wrong (very high) value or "open"..?? :icon_wink:
(in case of "open", your DMM impedance sets the voltage divider lower part resistance..)
"I'm getting older while being taught all the time" Solon the Athenian..
"I don't mind  being taught all the time but I do mind a lot getting old" Antonis the Thessalonian..

Rob Strand

One odd thing about your schematic is there's ground symbols with and without "GND".
Are you sure the two grounds are connected together on the PCB?
Send:     . .- .-. - .... / - --- / --. --- .-. -
According to the water analogy of electricity, transistor leakage is caused by holes.

mark2

R8 and R9 are correct, that's the first thing I checked :)

The GND inconsistencies in the schematic didn't make their way to the PCB.

HOWEVER... in checking out the latter I realized I may have reversed my opamp. So I'll go fix that first and check. Given that the opamp is one of very few things connected to VREF I think we may have found a winner.

Thanks! I'll report back.

Edit: by the way, I couldn't find any orientation markings on this TL074CDT at all. No dot, no half moon. I'm just relying on the orientation of the text printed on it.

Phoenix

Quote from: mark2 on May 12, 2021, 11:57:37 AM
Edit: by the way, I couldn't find any orientation markings on this TL074CDT at all. No dot, no half moon. I'm just relying on the orientation of the text printed on it.

CDT, that's a SOIC package, the side with pin 1 is bevelled.

mark2

I hadn't noticed the bevel marking before; good to know!
And fixing the orientation of the opamp fixed this issue.  On to the next.

Thanks everyone!