Sanity check on a simple hard clipping switch arrangement

Started by ctelecaster, September 30, 2023, 09:19:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ctelecaster



I'm 99% sure this is the dumbest question of the day, but these two arrangements of an ON/OFF/ON in relation to a pair of hard clipping diodes are functionally identical and both "correct", right? The objective is center disconnected, one side connected through a limiting resistor, and the other side connected directly.


idy


Rob Strand

Even simpler is to permanently connect the resistor and just short it with one contact of an SPST switch
Send:     . .- .-. - .... / - --- / --. --- .-. -
According to the water analogy of electricity, transistor leakage is caused by holes.

marcelomd

Quote from: Rob Strand on September 30, 2023, 10:02:44 PMEven simpler is to permanently connect the resistor and just short it with one contact of an SPST switch

Not the same. You lose the option of "no clipping".

Rob Strand

Quote from: marcelomd on October 01, 2023, 12:26:50 AM
Quote from: Rob Strand on September 30, 2023, 10:02:44 PMEven simpler is to permanently connect the resistor and just short it with one contact of an SPST switch

Not the same. You lose the option of "no clipping".

I was following the OP's schematic but his text says "ON/OFF/ON", so, not the same in that case.
Send:     . .- .-. - .... / - --- / --. --- .-. -
According to the water analogy of electricity, transistor leakage is caused by holes.

stallik

With the above arrangement, you may notice a volume change between bypass and diodes. At least, this is what I found so, I wired a switch like this to overcome the issue

Vary the resistor value to suit the diodes
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein