Basic: Voltage Divider question

Started by Auke Haarsma, February 22, 2007, 04:03:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Auke Haarsma

This site explains a voltage divider quite clearly: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/voldiv.html#c1

If I have two 10k's dividing the voltage (9Vcc) I get 4.5V in between the two R's, right? Now, theory says that if I provide a load of 1M in between the two R's, I'd get something like 4.47 V. So far for theory. Now, *my* practice.

I put it on the board like this:


9V+-----10k
|         |
|         y ----1M---x
|         |
-------10k

Now, if I measure with my DMM at point y, I get indeed the mentioned 4.5 V. But if I measure at point x, then I get 2.37V, where theory predicts 4.47. I'm sure this is an error on my side, but I don't see/understand it yet.

Anyone to shed some light?

brett

Hi
your multimeter has a resistance of about 1M.
So while it "nominally" reads 4.5V, it actually is reading only half of the 4.5V (ie 4.5V x 1M/(1M+1M)), or about 2.25V.

Better quality DMMs have an input impedance of 10M or more, so that the problem is only encountered when measuring very high impedances.
cheers
Brett Robinson
Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend. (Mao Zedong)

Auke Haarsma

thanks for your reply. If I understand correctly, my DMM is not suited for measuring circuits under a load of ~1M or more.  Could I simply increase the resistance of my DMM by placing a 10M resistance (eg.) between the probe and the circuit I'm measuring?

Paul Perry (Frostwave)

Quote from: ponq on February 22, 2007, 04:41:07 AM
thanks for your reply. If I understand correctly, my DMM is not suited for measuring circuits under a load of ~1M or more.  Could I simply increase the resistance of my DMM by placing a 10M resistance (eg.) between the probe and the circuit I'm measuring?
That won't work, because the resistance of your DMM would form part of a voltage divider with the 10M resistor attached to it.
What *MIGHT* help, is to measure using a higher voltage range, because that might have a higher input impedance. Try and see if the voltage it gives you is higher!

brett

Although it is a nuisance, if you know the impedance involved and the impedance of you meter,you can back-calculate to the tru voltage.  The formula is Vtrue = Vmeasured x (circuit impedance + meter impedance) / meter impedance

Having a meter with an impedance close to 1M makes it easy to calculate the right multiplier.  330k = x 1.33  470k = x 1.47  1 M = x 2  3.3 M = 4.3   4.7M = x 5.7.  See the pattern?
Above 4.7M you'll need to calculate the impedance of the meter exactly and use the formula, because small deviations away from 1M makes a large difference to the multiplier.
cheers 
Brett Robinson
Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend. (Mao Zedong)

Auke Haarsma

thanks for the tips, I'll check my DMM soon!

slacker

Another solution that I've seen mentioned here but never tried is to make a simple noninverting buffer out of a high impedance opamp like a tl072. Then connect a wire to the + input of the opamp and use that to probe the circuit and connect the probe of your DMM to the output of the opamp.
The opamp presents a much higher impedance to the circuit than your DMM so it should improve the accuracy of the readings.