Modifying an MXR Microamp

Started by anacrusis, March 23, 2011, 10:15:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

anacrusis

My MXR Microamp pedal boosts the signal just fine, however, when the volume is at zero the normal guitar volume still comes through completely, you can't turn it down at all..

Is there any way to modify this so that when the volume is at zero, no sound at all comes through? or if there is a way to at least be able to lower the volume at all?

Güero

Curing the infection one bullet at a time.

anacrusis


Thomeeque

#3
Quote from: Güero on March 23, 2011, 10:59:00 PM
Jumper in place of R6

Nope, it would just lead to "infinite" boost at max.

MicroAmp is non-inverting amp, where AC signal gain (considering C3 & C5 to be big enough and C2 small enough to be ignored) equals:

Gopamp = 1 + R4/(R5 + R6)

Gtotal = Gopamp * R10/(R9 + R10) = (1 + R4/(R5 + R6)) * R10/(R9 + R10)

Minimal gain (R5=500k) = approx. 1.

There is no way how to modify it to go to zero (turn it down at all) by simple part replacement*. What you can do is to set lower minimal gain (but never to zero), e.g. by altering output R9/R10 divider or by introducing input divider. But it has some drawbacks too. What do you need this mod for exactly?

T.


* EDIT: Actually you could if you would not mind to replace R9/R10 divider by volume pot (but it's simple only on paper :)).
Do you have a technical question? Please don't send private messages, use the FORUM!

anchovie

Quote from: anacrusis on March 23, 2011, 10:15:47 PM
or if there is a way to at least be able to lower the volume at all?

Your guitar's volume control?
Bringing you yesterday's technology tomorrow.

FlyingZ

#5
Make r5 a trimmer then replace r9 and r10 with the old pot. BTW that schematic is very outdated if ever truly correct.

Thomeeque

Quote from: anchovie on March 24, 2011, 06:09:59 AM
Your guitar's volume control?

Depends on where is his MicroAmp placed in his signal chain.

Quote from: FlyingZ on March 24, 2011, 06:18:00 AM
Make r5 a trimmer then replace r9 and r10 with the old pot.

This could lead to loss of dynamics in some situations (pedal could by internally overdriven thanks to preset gain >> 1 without chance to adjust it from outside).

IMO anacrusis should clarify what exactly he needs this mod for first.

Quote from: FlyingZ on March 24, 2011, 06:18:00 AM
BTW that schematic is very outdated if ever truly correct.

Is there a new one? Or do you know what is different now?

T.
Do you have a technical question? Please don't send private messages, use the FORUM!

petemoore

  You could set the level and leave that where.
  Then add an end volume control, a 10kA pot across where R10 was, wiper-output.
Convention creates following, following creates convention.

Fender3D

lol guero 2 - netiquette 0!  :icon_lol:

Tom is right, but you might use this mod to get rid of volume when at "0"



hmm... 500k's a too much large value maybe...
then out impedance will vary...
what about adding a volume pot instead of R9/R10?
You'll get a nice 2 knobs pedal  :icon_mrgreen:
"NOT FLAMMABLE" is not a challenge

Güero

Curing the infection one bullet at a time.

Thomeeque

#10
Quote from: Fender3D on March 24, 2011, 07:19:11 AM
Tom is right, but you might use this mod to get rid of volume when at "0"



Hat's off, Federico, brilliant!!

Quote from: Fender3D on March 24, 2011, 07:19:11 AM
hmm... 500k's a too much large value maybe... then out impedance will vary...

He could maybe still left something on R10 place (even maybe those 10K - I'm always bit puzzled with log/rev-log thinking, but IMO most of it's rotation would be "right side" of R5 pot ignorably big and "hit in" only close to "0").. then out impedance would not vary that much..

Quote from: Fender3D on March 24, 2011, 07:19:11 AM
what about adding a volume pot instead of R9/R10?
You'll get a nice 2 knobs pedal  :icon_mrgreen:

Yep, that's probably the cleanest way, but there's definitely potential in your idea above..

T.
Do you have a technical question? Please don't send private messages, use the FORUM!

Fender3D

Thanks Tomas, but it's not my stuff...
Peavey used it plenty in their mixers and amps  :icon_wink:

@Guero
cya on top of Mercy Hospital and watch out those boomers!!!  :icon_lol:
"NOT FLAMMABLE" is not a challenge

Güero

Quote from: Fender3D on March 24, 2011, 08:37:42 AM

@Guero
cya on top of Mercy Hospital and watch out those boomers!!!  :icon_lol:

Mercy Hostipal top A.K.A.  HELL on Earth

heheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh

I hate the Smokers more than the Boomers  :)
Curing the infection one bullet at a time.

Mark Hammer

The simplest, most trouble-free, arrangement would be to simply replace R10 with a 10k log pot.  The stock circuit never provides less than a gain of 1.11x, which is fine if you're aiming to use it only for boost.  But if a person want to also use it as a sort of volume pedal preset, and achieve less than unity, the non-inverting configuration won't easily do it for you.

If implementing a second control knob is a non starter, then just replace R5 with a trimpot set for whatever you imagine the most boost you might usually ever want, and let the new output volume pot take its place on the chassis.  That way, you'll be able to go from max boost to less than unity when you want.

Thomeeque

Do you have a technical question? Please don't send private messages, use the FORUM!

Mark Hammer

Okay, I'm here to learn.  By my calculations, [56k+500k+2k7] / [500k+2k7] = 1.11

What am I not factoring in?

Thomeeque

Quote from: Mark Hammer on March 24, 2011, 11:46:45 AM
Okay, I'm here to learn.  By my calculations, [56k+500k+2k7] / [500k+2k7] = 1.11

What am I not factoring in?

The output divider R10/(R9 + R10)
Do you have a technical question? Please don't send private messages, use the FORUM!

Mark Hammer

OK, so we're differentiating here between gain of the op-amp stage (my calculation) and total gain available at the output (your calculation).  Fair enough.