what does this schematic symbol mean?

Started by pinkjimiphoton, July 15, 2011, 01:04:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

pinkjimiphoton

i've never seen it before...



is it a pot with two of the lugs tied together?

it's from analogguru's FET booster..

thanks folks!
;)
  • SUPPORTER
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace."
Slava Ukraini!
"try whacking the bejesus outta it and see if it works again"....
~Jack Darr

frequencycentral

Trimmer, with lugs 1 and 2 tied to ground.

TP1= Trim Pot 1
http://www.frequencycentral.co.uk/

Questo è il fiore del partigiano morto per la libertà!

Fender3D

It's a trimmer with 2 lugs tied together.

Edit:

Rick you beat me...
"NOT FLAMMABLE" is not a challenge

pinkjimiphoton

thanks guys!! i learn a lot here, for sure! thanks for the speedy response!  :icon_biggrin:
  • SUPPORTER
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace."
Slava Ukraini!
"try whacking the bejesus outta it and see if it works again"....
~Jack Darr

Gurner

#4
You'll often hear such a beast referred to as a rheostat.....such a config turns a pot or trimmer (which is what the symbol is) from a potential divider into a simple two legged variable resistor.

Ice-9

Quote from: Gurner on July 15, 2011, 02:07:50 PM
You'll often hear such a beast referred to as a rheostat.....such a config turns a pot or trimmer (which is what the symbol is) from a potential divider into a simple two legged variable resistor.

I always though a rheostat was a wire wound pot, and rather large component compaired to a trim pot.
www.stanleyfx.co.uk

Sanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same result. Mick Taylor

Please at least have 1 forum post before sending me a PM demanding something.

Gurner

#6
Quote from: Ice-9 on July 15, 2011, 06:20:04 PM
I always though a rheostat was a wire wound pot, and rather large component compaired to a trim pot.

Rheostats are quite often used with higher currents (ie wirewound), but that usage/term is not exclusive.

For example, when buying digital pots you have the option of a standard (three terminal)  pot or a rheostat version (two terminal/variable resistor)... to prove my point, have a look at the top right of this digipot datasheet http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/21978c.pdf - these digipots are very low (non wirewound!) current devices ....so the term rheostat has now morphed into a way of differentiating the intended use/config of a pot.....three terminal (potential divider) or two legged rheostat (variable resistor)

Minion

I allways called that pot wiring configuration a variable resistor as opposed to a voltage divider like a volume pot is wired .....
Go to bed with itchy Bum , wake up with stinky finger !!

Gurner

#8
Quote from: Minion on July 15, 2011, 07:57:34 PM
I allways called that pot wiring configuration a variable resistor as opposed to a voltage divider like a volume pot is wired .....

Which is perfectly reasonable ....but the IC manafacturers have now taken a penchant to calling such variable resistors rheostats....I guess it removes any potential for doubt (whilst a volume pot is clearly a potential divider, it achieves this by having a variable resistance on the wiper  ....& let's face it - rheostat is a cool name, we don't often get to use an "h" after an "r" & I was getting sick of singing Rhinestone Cowboy to fulfill this need)